honolulutraffic.comformerly The Alliance for Traffic Improvement |
Seeking cost effective ways to reduce traffic congestion on Oahu |
The one-page case against rail transit for First, in
the whole The
percentage is critically important and here’s why. In If Oahu
officials were able to halt the current decline through the use of rail transit,
and were able to increase public transportation commuters to 10 percent
(something that no other urban area has done), then for every 10,000 new
commuters, there would be 1,000 new public transportation users and 7,000 more
cars on the road. Obviously, even this is not going to help traffic congestion. This is
why every city that has installed rail transit has, in practice, experienced regular and continued
increases in traffic congestion. Our
problem is a lack of road capacity; If we go
ahead with the new $900 a family cost of the G.E. tax increase to build rail, then
on top of that fund the annual operating $52 million subsidy, it will use every
spare dollar in the community and we will not be able to take those actions
that have been shown to help with congestion. For
example, we can start with a reversible two lane High
Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lanes between Waikele and Pier 16. It
qualifies for the same $500 million funding as rail transit. But the local funding required is a fraction of that
needed for rail transit — $300 million versus $2.1 billion for rail. As
experienced in San
Diego and Houston, HOT lanes with priorities for buses and vanpools
carry four times the number of occupants per vehicle as regular freeway lanes.
Thus its two lanes carry the same number of people as eight freeway lanes in
one direction or 16 lanes bi-directional. Summary: |